Saturday, December 1, 2012

(27) Cardinal Dolan: An Analysis of the Election Through the Lens of Faith

Cardinal Dolan gives a great analysis of the 2012 Election through the lens of  faith.

 

Looking Back at Election Day

CARDINAL TIMOTHY DOLAN

After asking me how our recovery from Hurricane Sandy is going, most folks these days then inquire about how I think "the Church did" on election day.


The 2012 campaign is over, and the dust is settling.  After asking me how our recovery from Hurricane Sandy is going, most folks these days then inquire about how I think "the Church did" on election day.

Such a question usually triggers a mini-catechism lesson from me, as I reply that, actually, "the Church" wasn't on the ballot, and the election was hardly a referendum on "the Church."  The Church, I go on, was founded by the one who stated that "My kingdom is not of this world," and whose members consider the statement of St.  Paul, "We have our true citizenship in heaven," as inspired by God.  The Bible's caution, "Put not your trust in princes," would today probably be rendered, "Put not your trust in politicians."

All true enough, and, in a genuine way, this attitude gives us a benign indifference to politics and elections.  We "seek first the Kingdom of God," not the power and platforms of worldly politics. 

But this "indifference" is tempered by the fact of faithful citizenship.  We are, as a matter of fact, very concerned about matters in this world, precisely because God has revealed truths about the human person that have serious implications for people of faith.  So, yes, while we are much more passionate about heaven than earth, about the teachings of Jesus and His Church than the platforms of any party or the promises of any candidate, we do have a duty to bring the values of faith to the political process.

Did we, Tuesday a week ago?

The data is still coming in, and will be months in arriving and being interpreted.  But, once again, it seems as if "we won some, we lost some."

One issue of deep concern to Catholics and many, many others is the defense of marriage from those who would presume to redefine it to suit contemporary movements (e.g., divorce on demand, "trial" marriage, or "same sex" marriage.)  Up until this election day, 32 states had given their people the chance to "redefine marriage" (an oxymoron for us), and 32 said no! (Some states took a more sinister route, ignoring a referendum, and allowing the legislature to tamper with the definition.)

The news last election day was not as bright, as the dilution of the essence of marriage won in three states.  So, it's 32-3.  But, there's no denying that the "winds are changing."  I'm told that the results were close in those three states, and that the exit polls showed that people of faith voted not to redefine marriage.

The death penalty is another issue of concern to those who believe that the promotion of the dignity of the human person and the protection of human life is the normative guide in our voting.  Here again the results were not positive.  The electorate in California had the chance to reject this lethal and unjust penalty.  The Church in California did its best to preach the "Gospel of Life," but apparently was less than effective.  The referendum lost.

Better news in Maryland, where the Church was true to our birthright of advocacy for the immigrant, and was part of a coalition very successful in pushing for the Dream Act, allowing immigrant children to attend college; and a ray of sunshine in Massachusetts, as Cardinal Sean O'Malley led a strong ecumenical and community based effort to defeat euthanasia.


It gets touchy when we try to analyze the presidential election with the lens of faith.  Some assume that the re-election of the president was a setback for people of faith.  That may be an exaggeration.  There is no denying that the president and his party are on record in promoting guidelines that gravely intrude upon religious freedom, and in their desire to expand unfettered access to abortion at all stages.  These two issues are of towering import to people inspired by the principles of human dignity and the sanctity of life.
 do worry about campaigns that let candidates off easy when it comes to substantive content on urgent issues, concentrating instead upon soundbites and caricatures.

The polls show that Catholics voted for the president, but that such support was lower than four years ago; and that Catholics who attend Sunday Mass regularly heavily supported his opponent.  These statistics would support a contention that Catholics do indeed let their faith have a say in the politics.

Of course, through the eyes of faith, neither candidate was perfect, as no political leader ever can be.

Some general impressions and worries do seem dominant 10 days later:

  • Thank God we are citizens of a country where campaigns and elections occur peacefully.  Not every country, tragically, can say that.
  • While we may be weary of conflict over political issues, even within the household of faith, it at least shows that we Catholic take our citizenship seriously, and do try our best to let the light of faith illuminate our political decisions.
  • I do worry about campaigns that let candidates off easy when it comes to substantive content on urgent issues, concentrating instead upon soundbites and caricatures.
  • I am concerned about the lopsided influence of well-oiled PACs, funded by the rich on both sides.  (The bishops in the state of Washington report that they were outspent 12 to 1 in their attempt to defend marriage; Cardinal O'Malley tells us that his opponents, promoting euthanasia, had all the money they needed for ads.)
  • I worry that the Democrats have gone from wanting to keep abortion "safe, legal, and rare" to the party that wants abortion at every stage of pregnancy, with no defense at all of the baby in the womb, completely funded by the government.
  • I fear the Republicans have turned their backs on immigrants, succumbing to the old American curse of nativism.
  • I'm concerned about a growing sentiment in our country that turns John Kennedy's lofty challenge on its head, as more and more now chant, "Ask not what I can do for my country, but what my government can do for me."
  • I worry about the popular wave of branding people who want to protect the life of the baby in the womb, and defend marriage as traditionally understood and given, as narrow-minded bigots trying to "impose" their outmoded views on others.
  • And I fear the dictatorship of the self: those on one side who insist that my money, my property, my income are all mine, and I have no duty to others, especially the poor; those on the other side who claim that my body, my urges, my sexual preferences, my life, my choices are supreme, and will not be subject to the common good.  (Even to the right to life of the baby in the womb). 

When all is said and done, we plod along, knowing that this side of Gabriel's trumpet, we'll never have a perfect setup, that Christ is our King, that "we have here no lasting home," and that faith and the freedom to live it out is the greatest protection of all to the dignity of the human person and the sanctity of life.



ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Archbishop Timothy Michael Dolan. "Looking Back at Election Day." Catholic New York (November 15, 2012).


Reprinted by permission of Catholic New York.

THE AUTHOR

Archbishop Timothy Michael Dolan was named Archbishop of New York by Pope Benedict XVI on February 23, 2009. Born February 6, 1950, Archbishop Dolan was ordained to the priesthood on June 19, 1976. He completed his priestly formation at the Pontifical North American College in Rome where he earned a License in Sacred Theology at the Pontifical University of St. Thomas. In 1994, he was appointed rector of the Pontifical North American College in Rome where he served until June 2001. While in Rome, he also served as a visiting professor of Church History at the Pontifical Gregorian University and as a faculty member in the Department of Ecumenical Theology at the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas. The work of the Archbishop in the area of seminary education has influenced the life and ministry of a great number of priests of the new millennium. Archbishop Dolan is the author of Doers of the Word: Putting Your Faith Into PracticeTo Whom Shall We Go?, and Advent Reflections: Come, Lord Jesus!.

Copyright © 2012 Archbishop Timothy Michael Dolan

Friday, April 27, 2012

(26) Fr. Thomas Loya: The Spousal Mystery: Why do we love sex?


      Fr. Thomas Loyapastor of Annunciation Byzantine Catholic Church in Homer Glen, IL., was the 2011 Diocesan Men's Day of Renewal speaker at the Basilica of St. Mary in Marietta.  An internationally known expert on the subject, he spoke on the Theology of the Body.  Blog #24 introduces his talk.  At the end of that article is a bio and a promotional article that we wrote on him for the Cleveland Catholic and secular media regarding the 2011 Men's Conference. More of his materials can be obtained from www.taborlife.orgTo see numerous samples of Fr. Loya's talks, go to www.youtube.com and type in Fr. Thomas Loya.

  The Spousal Mystery
Why do we love sex?
By Fr. Thomas J. Loya, STB., MA. Tabor Life Institute  www.taborlife.org

In our first article in this series we said that our bodies “speak a language” precisely by the fact that our bodies are gendered. It is the language of “gift.” Being able to read the “language of our bodies” helps men and women to understand “why” they are male and female which in turn allows them to know “how” to be male and female and therefore how to truly be for each other. But, I have a question for you and please be honest: Raise your hand if your greatest most burning desire in life has been to live a life completely without love, sex, marriage, children, intimacy and friends?

For as many times as I have asked this question to audiences I have never, ever had anyone raise their hand and say, “Yep, that’s me!” So my next question is, “What is so great about love, sex, marriage, children, intimacy and friends?” These things must be huge because I cannot find anyone who will say that they really, really want to live a life without these things. I believe that the answer lies in a very huge source.

Let’s consider for a moment the Christian or Biblical concept of God: Three distinct persons, Father, Son and Holy Spirit yet united together as one God. Huh!? Hey, it’s a mystery, OK? Don’t try to figure it out. These three persons exist in an eternal exchange of love between themselves. The Biblical God is a God who is like a family within Himself, or in other words a union and communion of persons.

But this God did something marvelous and incomprehensible, something that much of the world celebrates on December 25th: God took on human flesh. He moved outward from the Trinity while still remaining in the Trinity. He united Himself freely, faithfully, fully, intimately and fruitfully with His own creation without ceasing to be God! Now, stop trying to figure this stuff out! Just go with it. It’s a mystery. Enjoy it.

The predominant analogy that the Bible uses to describe this action of God intimately uniting himself with His own creation is “marriage.” Mystically speaking God becomes the “groom” and we become his “bride.” The great modern day Polish philosopher, Karol Wojtyla called this the “Spousal Mystery.” (Wojtyla would later become known as Pope John Paul II.)

The very first thing said in the Bible about human beings is that we were created in the “image and likeness of God.” Consequently, like the Biblical God, we too, as human beings are made to become a union and communion of persons that seeks to make a free, faithful, full and fruitful gift of self. There is no denying this because it is stamped in our very bodies as male and female. And this provides the great “why” behind the reason that no person can imagine living without love, sex, marriage, children, intimacy children and friends. These are the things that make us most like God. Our search for intimacy, love, sex, and fruitfulness lies behind both our worst and best choices in life. In one way or another we seek, seemingly in desperation, love, intimacy and fruitfulness.

It is precisely through our genders that we as human beings can actually love as God loves. We can enter into this “Spousal Mystery.” In fact, philosopher Wojtyla proposed that the Spousal Mystery is the “fundamental element of human existence!” Our sexuality is an icon of the very interior life of a God who is three persons, yet one God.

This Spousal Mystery is like the DNA of the created order. Think of a beautiful, bright moon on a clear starry night. The moon is bright only because the light of the sun moves outward from itself. The moon, like the “bride” receives the sun’s light and in reciprocal fashion reflects back the light of the sun. The seashore, like the “bride,” receives the waves of the sea (“groom”) and then in reciprocal fashion sends the very same waters back out again into the sea. The participation of the created order in this Spousal Mystery comes to its fullness in the human person, and in particular through our gendered bodies.

Gender is therefore purposeful. It is not arbitrary. It is not just a preference or even a mistake. Gender reveals God and enables us to participate in the way God loves. To know “why” we are a man or a woman is the secret to knowing “how” to be a man or a woman and therefore how to be for each other. The great “why” is told in the “language of our bodies. “

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

(25) Fr. Thomas Loya: Same Sex Marriage and the Church: True Compassion, True Sensitivity, True Love, True Happiness


      Fr. Thomas Loyapastor of Annunciation Byzantine Catholic Church in Homer Glen, IL., was the 2011 Diocesan Men's Day of Renewal speaker.  An internationally known expert on the subject, he spoke on the Theology of the Body.  Blog #24 introduces his talk.  At the end of that article is a bio and a promotional article that we wrote on him for the Cleveland Catholic and secular media regarding the 2011 Men's Conference. More of his materials can be obtained from www.taborlife.orgTo see numerous samples of Fr. Loya's talks, go to www.youtube.com and type in Fr. Thomas Loya.

 Same Sex Marriage and the Church
True Compassion, True Sensitivity, True Love, True Happiness
By Fr. Thomas J. Loya, STB., MA. Tabor Life Institute  www.taborlife.org

“If they are not doing any harm to someone else, why would the Church be against two people of the same gender being married?”

Establishing Some Things Up Front First
Before looking at this question itself let’s establish some things right up front. The Church, and Almighty God, wants everyone to be happy in this life and forever in the next life.  The Church is all about true compassion, true sensitivity, true love and true happiness. The Church will never embrace counterfeit forms of these virtues even under pain of persecution and death. This is because the Church loves people too deeply to ever betray them with anything less than true compassion, true sensitivity, true love and true happiness.  In doing so the Church is manifesting God’s sensitivity, compassion and love which Jesus Christ modeled for us on the Cross. True sensitivity, true compassion, true love and true happiness are a function of two things: fidelity to truth itself and accepting the reality of the Cross. If the truth is diluted or obscured in any way, then there is be no true compassion, sensitivity, love and happiness.  There is only agenda and self-interest.

True sensitivity, true compassion, true love and true happiness will ultimately in some way involve embracing the Cross and Resurrection. This will always involve continual choices in varying degrees to die to self and rise to our true and best selves. It will always involve putting others and the good of the community above our own feelings, desires and self-centeredness no matter how strongly we feel these desires

When Jesus Christ hung on the Cross the people going by said that they would believe in him if only Jesus would get rid of the Cross. Yet, the Cross was the one thing that Jesus Christ would NOT take out of the equation because He knew that the Cross was our only ticket to true and ever lasting happiness and He loved us too much to take it out of the equation. The Church is the same way. People criticize and hate the Church not so much because of its “teachings” on these moral hot button issues like same sex attraction, but because the Catholic Church (included here also are the Orthodox Churches) is the only entity on earth that will not dilute the Cross or take the Cross out of the equation for the same reason that Jesus Christ would not—true sensitivity, true compassion, true love, true happiness. Jesus was persecuted for this and so will the Church be also.  The Church is the conscience of the world and let’s face it, who really likes their conscience?  Our conscience bugs us, so we try to ignore or silence it.

The prerequisite of undying fidelity to truth yet of dying to ourselves frightens us because we think that our own legitimate needs will go unmet.  But it is precisely in dying to self that we find our true selves and have our legitimate needs met to the degree that it is possible on this side of eternity.  Having established the truth about the Church, let’s now look at the question itself.

The Question Itself
First, the question itself is flawed. It reflects three things that are characteristic of our culture and which underlie so many of our problems and difficulty in moral discernment: compartmentalization, disintegration and radical privacy. The question itself also reflects the moral relativism of our times. 

There is no such thing as someone doing something in the “privacy of their own home” and not affecting others. There is no such thing as a “private sin.” The human race by nature is communal. We are integrated. It is like the links on a chain.  Do harm to one link and the entire chain is affected. As a society we seem to have some understanding of this. For example, it is illegal to use heroin or cocaine even in the “privacy of our own home.” It is illegal to commit suicide or to take a prostitute into the “privacy of our own home.” In fact our culture seems to be heading toward making it illegal for someone to smoke in the “privacy of their own home.” Our society knows that abusing drugs is harmful to someone and doing harm to ourselves will affect others because we are communal beings. An individual who becomes an addict in the “privacy of their own home” becomes a burden on society because drug abuse leads to broken marriages, broken families, abuse, poverty and crime. This in turn stresses our social infrastructures which in turn can inspire raising taxes. We could go on and on and all of this is because someone was doing something in the “privacy of their own home” thinking they were “not hurting anyone else.”

Secondly the question itself is flawed and in fact the entire discussion on same sex marriage is flawed because “marriage” between people of the same gender is simply not possible. It does not and cannot exist. So, why are we, as a supposedly sophisticated society, considering legislation about something that cannot exist!?  We look like absolute fools!

Words mean things and they point to concrete realities. We cannot attach just any word to any reality we want. This is part of that moral relativism we mentioned earlier: In moral relativism life and morality have no absolutes.  Life and morality are just anything that we want them to be, anything that we label them to be.  What matters is what we feel about them and not what the reality is in itself. When we do this we set up a dishonesty, an illusion and delusion which in turn hurts the individuals involved and, as we said earlier, the whole community.  Chasing an illusion can only lead to a simmering frustration beneath a façade of happiness. 

The fact of the matter is among the population that practices a so called “gay lifestyle” there are higher percentages of things like depression, abuse, suicide, HIV, AIDS and colon cancer than among the rest of the population.
Although some like to deny these realities they are nonetheless true.  Since, as we said at the beginning, the Church and God want us to be happy, the Church will not support an illusion, a delusion or an untruth that the Church knows will not ultimately bring about true happiness but instead will lead to this simmering frustration and unfulfillment.

The word “marriage” itself has within its own construct the concepts of motherhood and gender (Matrimony=”matri=mother.) Furthermore, the word “marriage” has a French root which implies manhood or fatherhood.)  If there are not two complimentary genders, then it cannot be “marriage.” Just because we call something by a name does not make it so. Marriage is not just “two people who love each other coming together.”  Marriage is being used today in the same sex agenda to legitimize attractions between people which are in fact not based in true sexuality even though that is how they are presented. 

If it does not involve people of complementary genders, it cannot be “sexual” in the true sense. It become counterfeit, an illusion and therefore ultimately harmful.  The mutual stimulation of sexual organs leading to mutual orgasm is simply just that. It cannot be “having sex” in the true sense of the word because it does not involve persons of complementary genders. Same sex activity involves bodies and the stimulation of body parts. But it is impossible for people of the same gender to come together sexually in the way that is unique to a female wife and a male husband.  A husband and wife come together in an integrated way—as total persons through their bodies—faithfully, freely, fully and fruitfully. When this happens between a real husband and wife something happens between the two of them that is mutually beneficial to their entire persons, not just to certain body parts.

The same sex behavior is compartmentalized, disintegrated and therefore can never, ever, be “sex” or “marriage” in the true sense of the word.  Yes, of course two people of the same gender are putting their bodies or some body parts together in what they erroneously call “sex.”  But the truth of the matter is that they are not and cannot actually have “sex.” Once again, the actual meaning of words becomes critical: “Sex” requires bodies that are complimentary and our bodies are a package deal—they include our whole person along with them.  So, if the bodies cannot truly come together in what we call “sex”, then the persons cannot either.  And sex is not just about genital stimulation and orgasm. It is about two persons becoming a union and communion of persons and in this way reflecting the very interior life of the Holy Trinity and sharing in the way that Christ the Bridegroom loved and united Himself with His Bride.  

As you can see, it is impossible to contain within sound bites the answer to why the Church does not approve of so-called same sex marriage. There is so much foundation, so much education and reconfiguring of our thinking and ethos that has to take place for people to understand where the Church is coming from on this issue and on all moral issues. However, the following bullet point type of answers can be helpful. Note that what two people of the same gender do actually does profoundly harm other people, and in fact the whole of society.



  1. Redefining marriage to mean something other than what is exclusively between a male husband and a female wife means that anything can be called “marriage:” incest, polygamy, bestiality, pedophilia, blow up dolls, or whatever! 

  1. Civil unions lead to so called same-sex “marriage.” In the state of Massachusetts, for example, where same-sex marriage was legalized, students are being exposed to instructions on the same sex agenda, pornography and illicit sexual acts. A judge even ruled that schools do not have to give parents the opportunity to pull their children from such exposure simply because same-sex “marriage” is now legal in Massachusetts.

  1. Same sex “marriages” deny a child a real male father and a real female mother.

4.   Same-sex civil unions and “marriages” are not civil rights issues. They are 
      not the same as the struggle for racial equality.

  1. Same sex “marriage” do not create families which contributes to the good of society. Rather they create a naturally sterile union.

  1. Since same sex civil unions and marriages in Massachusetts were legalized the HIV and AIDS disease rates have gone up considerably.

  1. Children will witness same sex partners kiss and fondle in restaurants and public places to test and reinforce that establishment’s “marriage equality.”

8.   Wedding halls, caterers, photographers, etc. will have to do same-sex   
      civil “marriages” or be arrested for discrimination.

  1. Catholic Charities has had to stop its foster care and adoption work for children because this Catholic organization would be forced to turn children over to co-habitating and same sex couples.  This goes against Catholic conscience.

  1. Either the cost for social security, health and life insurance, etc. will skyrocket or the benefits will decrease dramatically in order to payout to everyone’s definition of a “spouse” or partner even if it is fraudulent.

  1.   If pastors and priests refer to same sex “marriage” as morally wrong according to the very order of creation made by God and written in the Bible, they will be charged with hate crimes.
 All of this may still leave a person with the emotionally laden question of, “But if these two people of the same gender really, really, love each other and they can’t be married, where can they find their happiness? After all, men and women can get married to each other and be happy. Why can’t “gay” people also be allowed to be happy too?”

The attraction that a person has for the same gender does not grow out of the same source as the attraction a man has for a woman that leads to marriage.
The attraction between people of the same gender has more to do with unmet developmental needs and/or hurts.  It is not love. Love is not about “needing” or even just about attraction. Love is about an act of a person’s will to choose to do or to not do whatever is best for the other person regardless of the cost to themselves. If is it not this than it is not really love, but rather, “need.”

However, two people of the same gender can love each other and they can even live together. They can enjoy what between them mutually works toward their becoming the best version of themselves, in other words, what leads to their holiness and salvation.  But this love and benefit from each other cannot be nor should it labeled or attempted to be lived out as the same love and complementary experience as that which can only take place between a male husband and female wife, i.e. “sexual” in the fullest sense of the word.

Beneath it all, every human is searching for intimacy because this is an experience of God and God made us in His image and likeness. This means we are made for intimacy.  But we are made for a true intimacy which can only be achieved by living in concert with God’s order of creation.  The Church is the only entity on earth that does not attach labels to people such as “gay” or “homosexual.” This is because labeling can never be sensitive, compassionate or loving and the Church is all about true sensitivity, true compassion, true love and true happiness. The Church prefers the word, “person” and teaches that the only adequate response to persons is love, respect and responsibility.  This is because the word “person” finds its definition in God.  There we go again with the all critical meaning of words and the concepts to which they point!

In the beautiful mind of the Church, there are only “persons.”  And some “persons,” through no fault of their own, have developed what they believe to be a sexual attraction to the same gender. But the Church knows better about what is really going on here and how to help that person negotiate through the often frightening, arduous but liberating journey of truth and honesty.  It is the Church and she alone who stands perpetually ready to accompany any person through that journey and the Church will do so every step of the way. 


 
CLEVELAND NATIVE FEATURED SPEAKER AT 2011 STEUBENVILLE DIOCESE MEN'S CONFERENCE

        Fr. Thomas Loya, a Byzantine Rite Catholic priest of the Byzantine Catholic Eparchy (i.e., Diocese) of Parma and a native of Cleveland, is the featured speaker this coming Saturday morning, April 2 during the Steubenville Diocesan Men's Day of Renewal at the magnificent St. Mary's Church in Marietta. A visit alone to that proposed basilica with its exquisite works of art and mosaic icon from Italy is worth the trip. The theme of the Conference is “Becoming a True Man of God”. It's really a homecoming since Fr. Loya, also an artist and iconographer, grew up in Seven Hills, where his parents still reside, and was baptized at the old St. Joseph Byzantine Catholic Church on Orleans Avenue. He is currently the pastor of Annunciation of the Mother of God Byzantine Catholic Church in Homer Glen, Illinois, near Joliet.

        His topic is “Theology of the Body as an Aid to Becoming a True Man of God.......Within Marriage and Outside of Marriage”. As a seminarian in Rome in the early 1980s, Fr. Loya first learned the Theology of the Body from John Paul II himself when the Pontiff first introduced it during 133 weekly general audiences from 1979 to 1984. Fr. Loya was so enthralled by the subject that he studied it further and is now a nationally known expert, giving talks around the country and abroad. He will show the beauty of sex as God intended and the wisdom of Church teachings on sexuality to help the men to become better husbands and fathers or single persons in preparation for either marriage or the celibate life. The participants will have the opportunity to understand the “why's” of church teaching on human sexuality with the biblical basis and the reasoning behind it.

        He has appeared on EWTN television and is the host of two radio programs, “A Body of Truth” and “Light of the East” which can be heard on ByzantineCatholic.com, CatholicRadioInternational.com, ewtn.com (Sunday 11:30 am Eastern), and EWTN radio affiliates in more than 60 cities across the United States. He has directed many retreats (TaborLife.com) and has been a guest speaker at conventions around the world including World Youth Day 2002. See www.TheologyoftheBody.net for more information, books, DVDs, CDs, etc. by Fr. Loya and other experts. His picture recently appeared in the October 24 issue of the national Catholic weekly, Our Sunday Visitor.

        Fr. Thomas Loya was a professional artist, having graduated from the Cleveland Institute of the Arts and having worked for Winterich Studios of Cleveland which does church interiors, before being called to the priesthood. He used those talents to build St. John the Baptist Byzantine Catholic Church in Solon, where he was pastor through the 1980s. Traveling southeast on Route 43 from Solon toward Sea World, one will see a rustic church on the left (Rt. 43 & Liberty Rd) with a gigantic icon of St. John painted on the facade. Fr. Loya himself painted it and many of the icons inside. Then after being transferred to Joliet, Illinois, he similarly built and painted another church, which he currently pastors.

        Reid Carpenter, the afternoon speaker, has served since 2001 as president of the Leadership Foundations of America (www.leadershipfoundations.org), a network of 30 local organizations, including the faith-based Pittsburgh Leadership Foundation which he founded to “Connect Leaders, Change Lives, Transform Cities”, both materially and spiritually. After many years as a nationally known evangelical leader, he discovered the Catholic Church and converted despite the risks to his career and friendships. Reid has been an adviser to numerous business corporations and community faith-based organizations, particularly in regard to youth and families, and the Value of the Person Movement in labor relations that fosters Labor-Management cooperation and problem solving.

         Very impressive is the enthusiasm that the men show in their singing and participation as they return refreshed and reinvigorated spiritually, all of which is contagious.